Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Coughlin v. New York State Unified Court System
as 24-101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM COUGHLIN, MARIE ZWEIG, ANNE GALLAGHER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, Chief Judge JANET DIFIORE, in her official administrative capacity as Chief Judge and others
Coughlin et al v. New York State Unified Court System
as 2:2022cv04001
Plaintiff:
Kim Coughlin, Marie Zweig, Anne Gallagher and others
Defendant:
New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration, Chief Judge Janet DiFiore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Coughlin et al v. New York State Unified Court System et al
as 2:2022cv04002
Plaintiff:
Kim Coughlin, Marie Zweig, Anne Gallagher and others
Defendant:
New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration, HON Janet DiFiore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Karen Stromberg, et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 19-15159
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAYAN CRUTCHER, JEFFREY DAVIS, DAVID KOPLOVITZ and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN HART, MICHELLE MACKAY, GAIL MARGOLIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Rotman et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 5:2017cv02169
Plaintiff:
Allan Rotman , Shari Cole , Phillip James Zacharias and others
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rotman et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Allan Rotman , Shari Cole , Phillip James Zacharias and others
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Gordon et al v. Amadeus IT Group, S.A. et al
as 1:2015cv05457
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gordon , Alan Rotman , Eileen Rotman and others
Defendant:
Amadeus IT Group, S.A., Amadeus North America, Inc. , Amadeus Americas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
