Cases
United States of America v. Battambang Market, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv12844
Defendant: Battambang Market, Inc., Srun Sry and Kim Eng Heng
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Arthur Parra, Sr., et al v. Langdon Neal, et al
as 09-8008
Petitioner: ARTHUR R. PARRA, SR., KIM ENG, VAL ENG and others
Respondent: LANGDON D. NEAL, RICHARD A. COWEN, MARISEL A. HERNANDEZ and others
Arthur Parra, Sr., et al v. Langdon Neal, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1404
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARTHUR R. PARRA, SR., KIM ENG, VAL ENG and others
Defendant - Appellee: LANGDON D. NEAL, Chairman of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, RICHARD A. COWEN, Secretary of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, MARISEL A. HERNANDEZ, Election Commissioner, Chicago Board of Election Commissioners and others
ATR-Kim Eng Financial Corporat, et al v. Hugo Bonilla
as 08-17241
Plaintiff - Appellee: ATR-KIM ENG FINANCIAL CORPORATION and ATR-KIM ENG CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: HUGO NERY BONILLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01062
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
ATR-Kim Eng Financial Corporation v. Bonilla et al
as 3:2007cv06239
Plaintiff: ATR-Kim Eng Financial Corporation, ATR-Kim Eng Financial Corporation, ATR-Kim Eng Financial Corporation and others
Defendant: Hugo Bonilla and Monica Araneta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Parra et al v. Neal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01506
Plaintiff: Arthur Parra, Sr, Arthur Parra, Sr, Kim Eng and others
Defendant: Langdon Neal, Richard Cowen, Marisel A Hernandez and others
Intervenor Defendant: Maria R. Godinez and Diane Gracia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?