Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Smith v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Deputy Rueben Perales, LOUIEE HERRARA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kimberly Smith v. County of Los Angeles et al.
as 2:2022cv01977
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Smith
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Deputy Ty Shelton, Deputy Ruben Perales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021at00984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Adams v. Smith et al
as 2:2020cv00949
Defendant:
Kimberly Smith and Amy Parsons
Plaintiff:
Brian Trent Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Chambers, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 16-56666
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE CHAMBERS, an individual and for all others similarly situated, LYNN VAN DER VEER, an individual and for all others similarly situated, JOSEPH CICCHELLI, an individual and for all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant:
KIMBERLY SMITH and CHRISTINE KNOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., INC., a New York corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08562
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
