Cases 1 - 10 of 209
YSN Imports LLC dba Flame King v. THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A
as 1:2024cv02356
Plaintiff:
YSN Imports LLC dba Flame King
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
King v. Malesk et al
as 1:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Roy D King
Defendant:
Alexandra Malesk, Elizabeth Domagalla, Lisa Kinsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Joseph Felton v. Manish S. Shah
as 24-1218
Petitioner:
JOSEPH A. FELTON
Respondent:
MANISH S. SHAH
Interested Party:
MICHAEL R. PAXSON, MICHAEL SHRAKE, ANGELINA SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
David King v. Universal Health Services of Hartgrove, Incorporat, et al
as 23-3154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID KING
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES OF HARTGROVE, INCORPORATED and UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
King v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C.
as 1:2023cv05334
Plaintiff:
Derick King
Defendant:
Blitt & Gaines, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
