Other Statutes Cases filed in Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03392
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. King
as 6:2023cv03071
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00501
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01514
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 7 Kings LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00910
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: 7 Kings, LLC, II Restaurant & Hookah Bar, NAKIA KING and 7 Kings LLC doing business as II Restaurant & Hookah Bar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
St. Clair County, Missouri v. Allergan PLC et al
as 4:2020cv01641
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Plaintiff: St. Clair County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. King
as 6:2020cv03074
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Jamari King
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246
Sturm v. A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02982
Plaintiff: Stephen Dalton Sturm
Defendant: DOES 1-10, inclusive, A-1 Premium Acceptance, Inc., d/b/a King of Kash and A-1 Premium Acceptence, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01703
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01021
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?