Cases 1 - 10 of 1,581
McPherson v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Hereditary Native American Seminole War Chieftain
as 1:2024cv01210
Petitioner:
Chief-King; Mr. Ne'Guerian Simone Wright
Respondent:
Hereditary Native American Seminole War Chieftain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08005
Petitioner:
Charles King, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JONES v. KING et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES and JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
JOSHEPH J BIDEN, WAKULLA ANNEX CORRECTION INSTITUTION SHIFT SUPERVISOR, SGT DICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SOUTH FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Defendant:
SOUTH FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER, L JACKSON, T SMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
DARREN TARRELL KING
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bless v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bless
Defendant:
Rickie Dixon, Warden of Reception and Medical Center, Carryion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bless v. Dixon et al
as 8:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bless
Defendant:
Rickie Dixon, Warden of Reception and Medical Center, Doctor Carryion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
