Cases 1 - 10 of 15
King #225645 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00526
Petitioner:
Terrance L King
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
El Neter v. Penzone
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
King Solomon Sekhemre El Neter
Respondent:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01962
Petitioner:
Frederick King, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Kristin Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
France v. Shinn et al
as 3:2020cv08075
Respondent:
David Shinn, Arizona, State and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Kory King France
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Arizona State Prison Complex, Florence et al
as 2:2019cv02554
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray King, Jr and Anthony Ray King, Jr.
Respondent:
Arizona State Prison Complex, Florence, Unknown Party, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01676
Petitioner:
Bradley Jon King
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Saad
as 2:2017cv01445
Petitioner:
Mark Lewis King
Respondent:
J Saad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. Shartle
as 4:2015cv00186
Petitioner:
Neal W King
Respondent:
John T Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King #074681 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00265
Petitioner:
Carman Nicholas King
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan , Travis Scott and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bussie et al v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv00041
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie, Jimmie O Beasley, Armando Roberto Aros and others
Respondent:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona State Prison Complex, Tucson, Richard G Renzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
