Cases 41 - 50 of 734
Jamison v. Central Mississippi Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2020cv00180
Defendant:
CMCF Medical Department, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Meetze v. CMCF Medical Dept. et al
as 4:2020cv00181
Defendant:
L. Sutton, Warden Miller, J. Farmer and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Wilmoth Meetze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ewing v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00664
Defendant:
Ronald King, Burl Cain and Warden Miller
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. King et al
as 1:2020cv00318
Plaintiff:
Jerett Jordan
Defendant:
James Fillyaw, John Doe and Ron King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Robinson et al
as 1:2020cv00280
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Demario Walker
Defendant:
Buffie Unknown, John Cooskey, Rita Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. King
as 3:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Ronald King
Plaintiff:
Dillion Williams
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amerson v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2020cv00564
Plaintiff:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamison v. King
as 3:2020cv00552
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Andrew Jamison
Respondent:
Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00482
Defendant:
Mr. Fillepip, Mrs. Michelle Jackson, Officer McKinnel and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Banks
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00425
Defendant:
Sheila Parks and Ron King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Denise Welch Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
