Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Crawford et al v. Bevin et al
as 3:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jamal R. Crawford and Walter D. King
Defendant:
Matt Bevin, Greg Fischer and Mark Bolton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruhbayan v. USA et al
as 6:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rajul Ruhbayan
Defendant:
USA, Loretta Lynch, Rebecca B. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathis v. Caraway et al
as 6:2015cv00181
Plaintiff:
Eric Devon Mathis
Defendant:
J.F. Caraway, Matthew W. Melladay, J.C. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Tangilag et al
as 5:2015cv00185
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lane King
Defendant:
Shastine Tangilag, Karen Vickery, Jennifer Whalen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pulliam v. Truman et al
as 3:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Elton Calvin Pulliam, Jr.
Defendant:
Karl Truman and James King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. King et al
as 5:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Devon A. Frye
Defendant:
Daniel King and Tiffany Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Thompson et al
as 5:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
Jamell M. King
Defendant:
LaDonna H. Thompson, Don Bottom, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Laurel County Detention Center et al
as 6:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray King
Defendant:
Laurel County Detention Center, Jamie Mosley, Shawn Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Bottoms et al
as 5:2013cv00229
Petitioner:
Jamell M. King
Respondent:
Don Bottoms, Fayette County Department of Corrections and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holder v. Saunders et al
as 7:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Christopher Holder
Defendant:
Stacy M. Saunders, Terry J. King and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
