Cases 1 - 10 of 49
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
LAMANUEL LAMAR KING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez-Rocha v. King
as 5:2023hc02026
Petitioner:
Jose Gomez-Rocha
Respondent:
Malinda L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. King
as 5:2022hc02164
Petitioner:
Tawoine Banks
Respondent:
Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. Ramos
as 5:2022hc02154
Petitioner:
Daniel H. King
Respondent:
Warden R. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez v. King et al
as 5:2022hc02140
Petitioner:
Alex Gonzalez
Respondent:
Malinda L. King and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Money v. King
as 5:2022hc02132
Petitioner:
Chad Houston Money
Respondent:
Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wall v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2022hc02009
Petitioner:
Philip Wall
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino, Warden Tamara S. Lyn and Warden Melinda King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Burton v. King
as 5:2022hc02003
Petitioner:
Brian Michael Burton
Respondent:
Warden M.L. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Syed Md v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2021hc02250
Petitioner:
Ghy Asuddin Syed Md
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino, Tamara S. Lyn, Melinda King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
