Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 207
DURHAM v. KING et al
as 2:2021cv00400
Defendant: NANCY GIANNETTA, LEON A. KING, II and JOHN DOE 2
Plaintiff: RAKYM DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorbey v. King et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00016
Defendant: A. King, Ian Connors, Gausetph and others
Plaintiff: Michael Owl-Feather Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING
as 2:2020cv06239
KING v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00243
Plaintiff: SHAWN KING
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI HOUTZDALE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KING v. MOSER
as 3:2020cv00191
Respondent: WARDEN MOSER
Petitioner: BRUCE KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv04132
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: NAIM SAMAR KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Chambers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00806
Plaintiff: Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant: Mr. Marr, Mr. Chambers, Mr. Bowlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
KING v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00023
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN WETZEL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CAMBRIA
Petitioner: DAVID KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00992
Defendant: OFFICER JASON K. UTT, OFFICER FRIEND ESTEP, NORTH VERSAILLES POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff: ANDREW KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. TOSSONE
as 5:2019cv02320
Defendant: SGT. TOSSONE
Plaintiff: DERRICK L. KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?