Cases 1 - 10 of 153
King v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacorey King
Defendant:
Warden Rose, Officer McCrainey, Unknown Transportation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Batts et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Quinton Antario King
Defendant:
Nicholas Batts, Hickman County Sheriff's Office and Joey Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. USA
as 1:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Garrian King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
James v. Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
King Allah James
Respondent:
Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center and Austin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ettienne v. Peralta et al
as 3:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Ettienne
Defendant:
Lt. Jason Peralta, Sgt. Adam Treinn, Supt. William Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00906
Plaintiff:
Brandon King
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Hamilton County Jail
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
King Allah James
Defendant:
Jim Hammonds, Deputy Cox, Hamblen County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Frensely
as 3:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. King
Defendant:
Corporal C. Frensely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford et al v. Hammonds et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Ford and King Allah James
Defendant:
Jim Hammonds, Deputy Cox and Hamilton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
