Cases 1 - 10 of 468
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hinson v. J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hinson
Defendant:
J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths, Dr. FNU Wozniack, Kim King, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King, Jr. v. Unknown Defendants
as 9:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
David King, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, FNU Mr. King, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Christian
as 5:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Drevonte King
Defendant:
Attorney M'Liss Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Warden King
as 4:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Juan Daniel Garcia
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Mitchell Ray King, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
