Cases 71 - 80 of 565
King v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02248
Plaintiff:
Jeanette King
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00713
Petitioner:
Karl L. King
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Robert King
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MESA Industries, Inc. v. Charter Industrial Supply, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
MESA Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Charter Industrial Supply, Inc., Alejandro Espinoza and Kyle King
Feathers v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
David E. Feathers
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Chief Inspector Chris Lambert, Warden Leon Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
King v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01253
Plaintiff:
Robert King, Jr.
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
HEATHER L. KING and ANDREW KING
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00822
Plaintiff:
George King
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05796
Plaintiff:
Charnell King
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
