Cases 1 - 10 of 125
King v. 17th Judicial Drug Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
David Michael King
Defendant:
17th Judicial Drug Task Force, Steven Daugherty and Casey Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
King v. Knox County Board of Education
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Angie King
Defendant:
Knox County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VanHooser v. Grundy County Municipal Unit et al
as 4:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Tara VanHooser
Defendant:
Grundy County Municipal Unit, Grundy County Sheriff's Department, Clint Shrum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King et al v. Hamilton County Medical Examiner et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Terry King and Lizzie King
Defendant:
Hamilton County Medical Examiner, M.E. Wilke and City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
King et al v. Drake et al
as 3:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dequan King and Antonio Hurt
Defendant:
John Drake, Glenn Funk, Jill Fitcheard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
