Cases 41 - 50 of 153
Benson v. Administration and Medical Department of Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv02346
Plaintiff:
Rickey Benson
Defendant:
Administration and Medical Department of Shelby County Division of Corrections, Officer Burton, Carla R. Seals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Chambers et al
as 3:2020cv00379
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Cpl. Antinio Chambers and Robinson, Reagan & Young, PLLC
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Bradshaw et al
as 3:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Unamed Loudon County Goverment Employees and Administrators, Corporal Angi Martin, Buddy Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Terry D King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watison v. Core Civic Solutions et al
as 1:2020cv00008
Plaintiff:
Raymond Watison and King Belal
Defendant:
f/n/u Cole, f/n/u Coleman, Samantha Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. King
as 2:2020cv02021
Petitioner:
Andrew Jamison
Respondent:
Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watison v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2019cv00088
Plaintiff:
Raymond Watison and Raymond
Defendant:
Herbert H. Slatery, III, State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. HCCF
as 2:2019cv00080
Respondent:
HCCF
Petitioner:
William Carter King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watison v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 2:2019cv02684
Plaintiff:
Raymond Watison and Raymond King Belal Watison
Defendant:
Herbert H. Slatery, III, Mr. Williams, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Mays
as 3:2019cv00858
Petitioner:
Jarron Deonte King
Defendant:
Tony Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Core Civic
as 1:2019cv01202
Defendant:
Core Civic
Plaintiff:
William Carter King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
