Cases 31 - 40 of 177
Caetano v. Kings County Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dwayne Caetano and Nathan Caetano
Defendant:
Kings County Sheriff, Kings County Superior Court and Executive Officer, Eastern District of California and Executive Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davies-Garcia v. County of Kings State Superior Family Law et al
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Kayla Davies-Garcia
Defendant:
County of Kings State Superior Family Law, Jennifer Giuliani, Kings County Human Resources Adoption Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bloomfield Investments, LLC v. Grow Land and Water LLC et al
as 4:2021mc80306
Plaintiff:
Bloomfield Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Grow Land and Water LLC and Kings County Ventures LLC
(PC) Love v. Hanford Kings County Jail, et al.
as 1:2021cv01419
Plaintiff:
Morris Lee Love and Morris Lee Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Hanford Kings County Jail, Van-Ness, Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rene Luna, Jr. v. Loll et al
as 1:2021cv01310
Plaintiff:
Rene Luna
Defendant:
Loll, Gomez and Kings County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponce et al v. Washburn et al
as 1:2021cv01291
Plaintiff:
David Ponce, Anthony Barker, Jesse Gomez and others
Defendant:
Officer Washburn, Josh Chavez, Officer Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Kings County Sherrif Department et al
as 1:2021cv01170
Plaintiff:
Jesse I Gomez
Defendant:
Kings County Sherrif Department, Corcoran Police Department, Hanford Adventist and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Franciscan Alliance, Inc. et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 3:2021cv05198
Plaintiff:
Franciscan Alliance, Inc. and King County Public Hospital District No. 1, DBA Valley Medical Center
Defendant:
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
King County v. McKinsey & Company Inc United States et al
as 3:2021cv04512
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company Inc United States and McKinsey & Company Inc
Plaintiff:
King County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re: McKinsey & Co., Inc. National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation
as 3:2021md02996
Plaintiff:
Washington County Fiscal Court, Meade County Fiscal Court, Menifee County Fiscal Court and others
Defendant:
McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C., McKinsey & Company Inc and others
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Tort Reform Association, State of Ohio and others
Interested Party:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
