Cases 1 - 10 of 32
FLAMER v. LYNN et al
as 2:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY JEROME FLAMER
Defendant:
LT. LYNN, MUHAMMED and SERGEANT KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARINELLI et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05215
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MARINELLI, TEDOR DAVIDO, MELVIN KNIGHT and others
Defendant:
JOHN E WETZEL, GEORGE M LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURDLE v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2021cv04887
Plaintiff:
RAMELL S. HURDLE
Defendant:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON, DAVID H. KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. DJINDJIEV et al
as 5:2019cv06131
Defendant:
STEEL STONE ROAD HANOVER TOWNSHIP WHO WORKED OCTOBER 13TH - 14TH (3RD SHIFT), JOSH LEADBETTER, DILLON KOCH and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK SEAN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNIGHT v. TICE et al
as 5:2018cv00661
Petitioner:
LEWIS BENJAMIN KNIGHT
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KNIGHT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01754
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KNIGHT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SCOTT v. KNIGHT et al
as 5:2014cv06917
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SCOTT
Defendant:
DAVID KNIGHT and CHRISTIAN PERRUCCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNIGHT v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv04576
Plaintiff:
JAMES KNIGHT
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JOSEPH C. KERSZNIAK and GOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. GRAY et al
as 2:2014cv01397
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BROWN
Defendant:
GRAY, REYNOLDS, KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELL v. GRAY et al
as 2:2014cv01150
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BELL
Defendant:
GRAY, REYNOLDS, KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
