Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Knight v. City of Elko et al
as 3:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Wade Alan Knight
Defendant:
Elko, City of, Ty Trouten, Andrew Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Knight v. City of Elko et al
as 3:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Wade Alan Knight
Defendant:
Elko, City of, Ty Trouten, Checketts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight v. Elko County et al
as 3:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Wade Alan Knight
Defendant:
Elko, County of, Aitor Narvaiza, Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02032
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
O'Brian, et al v. Hernandez-Torres, et al
as 2:2021cv01286
Defendant:
NANCY BELL O'BRIAN, THOMAS CHARLES O'BRIAN, III, SUSANA HERNANDEZ-TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GST International, Inc. v. Martin et al
as 3:2021cv00285
Defendant:
Hargett Materials, Inc., Brandon Rapolla, Tom Martin and others
Plaintiff:
GST International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Knight v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
David Allen Knight
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Arch Insurance Company v. Knight Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00723
Plaintiff:
Arch Insurance Company
Defendant:
Knight Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Michaels et al v. Pustylnikov et al
as 2:2021cv00484
Plaintiff:
Deian Borislav Kolev, Chris Michaels and Christine Le
Defendant:
Dmitry Pustylnikov and Knight Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
