Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Alexander et al
as 5:2024cv04568
Plaintiff:
Lapreciouse Catlett, Shanae Butler, Brenna Cherry and others
Defendant:
SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC. doing business as SESAME PLACE PHILADELPHIA and SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT LLC doing business as SESAME PLACE PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Scotttrade, Inc. v. Shane Lefeber, et al
as 12-35746
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTTTRADE, INC.
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee:
PATRICIA FALLER
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
SHANE M. LEFEBER
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellee:
KRISTINE DAVENPORT
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD FALLER
Scotttrade, Inc. v. Kristine Davenport, et al
as 12-35711
Plaintiff:
SCOTTTRADE, INC.
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTINE DAVENPORT
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD FALLER
Kristine Davenport v. USDC-MBIL
as 11-73912
:
In re: KRISTINE DAVENPORT, individually
Petitioner:
KRISTINE DAVENPORT, individually
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, BILLINGS
Real Party In Interest:
SHANE M. LEFEBER, individually, CHRISTOPHER GIBBONS, individually, KIMBERLY CHABOT, individually and others
Arnold Faller v. Kristine Davenport, et al
as 11-36038
Plaintiff:
SCOTTTRADE, INC.
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTINE DAVENPORT
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD FALLER
Arnold Faller v. Kristine Davenport, et al
as 11-35958
Plaintiff:
SCOTTTRADE, INC.
Defendant-third-party-plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTINE DAVENPORT
Third-party-defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD FALLER
Scottrade v. Davenport et al
as 1:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Scottrade
Defendant:
Kristine Davenport, Shane M. Lefeber , Christopher Gibbons and others
Cross_claimant:
Patricia Faller , Kimberly Chabot, Christopher Gibbons and others
Cross_defendant:
Kristine Davenport, Patricia Faller and Shane M. Lefeber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
