Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Guixiang Hu v. Chunli Wang et al
as 8:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Guixiang Hu
Defendant:
Chunli Wang and Shao Kun Mao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Kun Wang et al v. David Radel et al
as 2:2022cv06303
Plaintiff:
Kun Wang and Qiangzi Zhang
Defendant:
David Radel, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Kun Chen v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 8:2022cv00893
Plaintiff:
Kun Chen
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Rosemary Langley Melville
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kun Chen v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv02889
Plaintiff:
Kun Chen
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
