Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Hughes v. Kansas Attorney General
as 5:2011cv03140
Petitioner:
Jessie D. Hughes
Respondent:
Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parrish-Parrado v. Rohling et al
as 5:2010cv03117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
Karen S. Rohling, Kansas, State of, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Jordan et al
as 5:2010cv03109
Plaintiff:
Chase Corbin Collins
Defendant:
Don Jordan and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickerell v. Keath et al
as 2:2010cv02089
Plaintiff:
Bradley Pickerell, Bradley Pickerell and Bradley Pickerell
Defendant:
James G. Keath, Kansas Attorney General and Sheila Sawyer-Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2009cv03281
Petitioner:
Tommy May
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2009cv04117
Plaintiff:
Janice Lynn King
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Kansas Attorney General, Child Support Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv03117
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renee Ross
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., (fnu) Melugin, (fnu) Suter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abilene Retail # 30, Inc. v. Kansas Attorney General
as 2:2009cv02195
Plaintiff:
Abilene Retail # 30, Inc.
Defendant:
Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mays v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2009cv03059
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mays
Respondent:
State of Kansas, J. Shelton, Kansas Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Steward v. Ruddick et al
as 5:2009cv03021
Petitioner:
Gary W. Steward
Respondent:
Peter Ruddick and Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
