Cases 11 - 20 of 31
John D. Simpson v. Terry McAuliffe
as 17-6637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DAVID SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY MCAULIFFE, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, KAREN D. BROWN, Chairman of the Commonwealth of Va. Division of Parole (VPB), HAROLD W. CLARKE, Executive Director, Virginia Department of Correction (VADOC) and others
Thomas Ebron v. Karen D. Brown
as 17-6622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EBRON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN D. BROWN, Chair, VA. Parole Board and VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Members
Leon Cheatham v. William Muse
as 17-6415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEON CHEATHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM MUSE, Chairman, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, WENDY K. BROWN, Legal Services Community Release Manager for VDOC and others
Dougherty v Commonwealth of Virginia, et al.
as 1:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Dougherty
Defendant:
Dana Lawhorne, Schuler, Sergeant Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ebron v. Brown et al
as 3:2017cv00143
Petitioner:
Thomas Ebron
Respondent:
Karen D. Brown and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv00052
Petitioner:
Demmerick Eric Brown
Respondent:
Karen D. Brown and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Church v. Director, Virginia Dept. Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00845
Plaintiff:
William L. A. Church
Defendant:
Director, Virginia Dept. Corrections, William Muse, Karen D. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. McAuliffe et al
as 3:2016cv00806
Plaintiff:
John D. Simpson
Defendant:
Terry McAuliffe, Karen D. Brown, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ebron v. Brown et al
as 3:2016cv00720
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ebron
Defendant:
Karen D. Brown and Virginia Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard Richardson v. Karen Brown
as 16-6911
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD RAY RICHARDSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN D. BROWN, Chairman of the Virginia State Parole Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
