Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE v FORMAN et al
as 4:2022cv00106
Defendant:
Courthouse News Service, BRENDA D FORMAN, Florida E-Filing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DAVIS v. MOODY et al
as 5:2021cv00228
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L DAVIS
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY and KAREN E RUSHING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Moody et al
as 8:2021cv01898
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Davis
Defendant:
Ashley Moody and Karen E. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2020cv00226
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Sarasota County Police Chief, Nancy Ludwigsen and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Conrad Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEVELS v. JOHNES-RIVA et al
as 4:2017cv00476
Defendant:
THOMAS M KNIGHT, JENNY NIMER, KENNETH LEE HAWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
RAY DONOVAN NEVELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reiblich v. Moss et al
as 8:2016cv01553
Plaintiff:
Mitchell W. Reiblich
Defendant:
Dana Moss, Andrew R. Van Sickles, Charles E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reiblich v. Moss et al
as 8:2016cv01484
Plaintiff:
Mitchell W. Reiblich
Defendant:
Dana Moss, Andrew R. Van Sickles, Charles E. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whisler v. Warden, Columbia Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2011cv00234
Petitioner:
Bill DeVere Whisler, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Columbia Correctional Institution, Karen E. Rushing, Leandra G. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
