Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sam Odeh v. A. Fish, et al
as 12-10263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAM ODEH
Defendant - Appellee:
A. JOE FISH, U. S. District Judge, SCOTT A MAULE, WILLIAM F SANDERSON, U. S. District Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe v. Arthur Brender, et al
as 10-11199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRYSTAL CAMPBELL, also known as Jane Doe
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTHUR BRENDER, KAREN COOMER DENNEY, MELISSA MADELINE GOODMAN and others
Jane Doe v. Arthur Brender, et al
as 10-10250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTHUR BRENDER, KAREN COOMER DENNEY, MELISSA MADELINE GOODMAN and others
Doe v. Brender et al
as 4:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Arthur Brender, Karen Coomer Denney, Melissa Madeline Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Brender et al
as 3:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Arthur Brender, Karen Coomer Denney, Melissa Madeline Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jane Doe v. Karen Mitchell, et al
as 09-16306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN LYNNE MITCHELL, SAMUEL A. LINDSAY, PAUL G. STICKNEY and others
Doe v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Karen Lynne Mitchell, Samuel A. Lindsay, Paul G. Stickney and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Odeh v. Fish et al
as 4:2008cv00549
Plaintiff:
Sam Odeh
Defendant:
A. Joe Fish, Scott Allen Maule, William F. Sanderson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hinds v. Roper et al
as 3:2007cv00035
Plaintiff:
Kevin Layne Hinds
Defendant:
Richard B Roper, III, Richard B Roper, III, Richard B Roper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
