Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Pierce v. Rohling
as 5:2009cv03183
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. Rohling et al
as 5:2009cv03144
Plaintiff:
Jose Garza
Defendant:
Karen Rohling, Correct Care Solutions and Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Rohling
as 09-3144
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER PIERCE
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS
In re: Arthur Caenen, Jr.
as 09-3142
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR J. CAENEN, JR.
Respondent:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Larson-White v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3349
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY STEVEN LARSON-WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, STATE OF KANSAS and STEVE MCKIEARNAN, Chaplin
Buffington v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3252
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BUFFINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLING, Warden of Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS, Phil Kline
Parrish-Parrado v. Rohling et al
as 5:2008cv03219
Petitioner:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Respondent:
Karen Rohling, Larned Correctional Facility, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bafford v. Revers et al
as 5:2008cv03161
Plaintiff:
Johnathan William Bafford
Defendant:
(fnu) Revers, Karen Rohling and Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bafford v. Pokorski, et al
as 08-3171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN WILLIAM BAFFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
(FNU) POKORSKI, Correctional Officer I, in his individual and official capacity, KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, in her individual and official capacity and ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity
In re: Caenen, Jr.
as 08-3150
Petitioner:
ARTHUR J. CAENEN, JR.
Respondent:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
