Cases 11 - 20 of 36
GILBERT, CARL C. JR. v. Astrazeneca Lp et al
as 3:2010cv00282
Plaintiff:
GILBERT, CARL C. JR.
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Lp, Owner of Astrazeneca Lp Company, Doctors of Medications of "quetiapine fumarate" and "seroquel" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sylvester Thomas v. J. Van Hollen, et al
as 10-2100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVESTER THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. B. VAN HOLLEN, KAREN TIMBERLAKE, BYRAN BARTOW and others
Thomas v. Van Hollen et al
as 1:2010cv00314
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Thomas
Defendant:
J B Van Hollen, Karen Timberlake, Byran Bartow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaworski v. Timberlake et al
as 2:2010cv00296
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jaworski
Respondent:
Karen Timberlake and Byran Bartow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GILBERT, CARL C. JR. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services et al
as 3:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
GILBERT, CARL C. JR.
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services , Sharon Nelson , BUREAU OF HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Timberlake
as 3:2010cv00092
Petitioner:
Charles Anderson
Respondent:
Karen Timberlake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sylvester Thomas v. J. Van Hollen, et al
as 10-1325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYLVESTER THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. B. VAN HOLLEN, KAREN TIMBERLAKE, CARLO ESQUEDA and others
Thomas v. Van Hollen et al
as 1:2010cv00050
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Thomas
Defendant:
J B Van Hollen, Karen Timberlake, Carlo Esqueda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Van Hollen et al
as 1:2010cv00046
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Thomas
Defendant:
J B Van Hollen and Karen Timberlake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Timberlake
as 3:2009cv00742
Petitioner:
Charles G. Anderson
Respondent:
Karen Timberlake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.