Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Diane Perkins, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
as 21-2223
Defendant / Appellee:
7 unnamed KCMO Police Officers, Michael L. Parson, Joel Elmer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Diane E. Perkins, authorized representative of Reginald Allen Perkins, deceased
Plaintiff:
Reginald Perkins, Deceased
SMITH v. FORSYTH et al
as 4:2017cv00576
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Kathleen A Forsyth, Daryl Ryan Taylor, Frank J Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. FORSYTH et al
as 1:2017cv01115
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE SMITH
Defendant:
KATHLEEN A. FORSYTH, DARYL RYAN TAYLOR, FRANK J. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Smith v. Kathleen Forsyth, et al
as 16-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen A. Forsyth, Jackson County Circuit Court Judge, Daryl Ryan Taylor, Attorney, Frank J. Murphy, Jackson County Circuit Court Attorney and others
Smith v. Forsyth et al
as 4:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Kathleen A Forsyth, Daryl Ryan Taylor, Frank J Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Perkins v. KCMO Police Dept., et al
as 13-2780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald Perkins
Defendant - Appellee:
KCMO Police Dept., Missouri State Board of Probation and Parole, K. Robin Sipe, Prosecuting Attorney and others
FORSYTH v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN L FORSYTH
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Strutton v. Forsyth et al
as 4:2007cv00174
Petitioner:
Dennis Strutton
Respondent:
Kathleen A Forsyth, Alan Blake and Janine Semar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strutton v. Forsyth et al
as 4:2007cv00312
Petitioner:
Dennis W. Strutton
Respondent:
Kathleen A. Forsyth, Alan Blake and Janine Semar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
