Cases 41 - 50 of 929
Fields v. Newsome et al
as 3:2023cv01416
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brent Fields
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, Kathleen Allison, D. Gouldy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 b Fed. Question: Bivens Act
In re CIM-SQ Transfer Cases
as 3:2022mc80066
Plaintiff:
Charles Carter, Sr., Robert Lee Cole, Lovell Colvin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ron Broomfield, State of California and others
Clinton v. Allison et al
as 3:2023cv01471
Plaintiff:
Markeith Clinton
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ray Madden, R. Buckel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Christopher et al v. State of CA, et al
as 2:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Paul Christopher and Carrea Christopher
Defendant:
State of California, Gavin, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Barnhardt v. Allison et al
as 1:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Barnhardt
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, McCabe, Ayala Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurry v. Allison
as 23-2075
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT ALLEN MCCURRY
Respondent / Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON
Joey Dayshaun Dennis v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv06294
Plaintiff:
Joey Dayshaun Dennis
Defendant:
D. Samuel, M. Roctla, Jim Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Lee et al
as 4:2023cv03660
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Defendant:
M. Lee, Hamner, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E Cuevas, G Khakh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Clark v. Allison
as 2:2023cv01524
Petitioner:
Christopher Charles Clark
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
