Cases 11 - 20 of 78
White v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01428
Plaintiff:
Keith White
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, Frank Sharpe, J. Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Rayvone Robinson
Defendant:
Raymond Madden, J. Gallegos, Frank Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Upshaw v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv01409
Plaintiff:
Andre Upshaw
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Theresa Cisneros, M. Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Ray et al
as 3:2022cv01299
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Anthony C. Ray and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Newsom et al
as 3:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Julian Carlos Hernandez
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, R. Acevedo, R. Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McDavid v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv00751
Petitioner:
Weldon K. McDavid, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burgess v. Shakiba et al
as 3:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Gary Burgess
Defendant:
Shakiba, S. Gates, R. Barenchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Allison
as 3:2022cv00742
Petitioner:
Donald R. Lewis
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nogales v. Burke et al
as 3:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Jose Nogales
Defendant:
Burke, Weiwel, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacome v. Hill et al
as 3:2022cv00546
Petitioner:
Alexander Jacome
Respondent:
James S. Hill, Gavin Newsom and Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
