Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Phelps
as 1:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
Charlene Phelps
Defendant - Defaulted:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Muckle v. US, et al
as 10-1652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL L. MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARACK OBAMA and others
Hoye v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human Service
as 3:2010cv30018
Plaintiff:
Charles Hoye
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Goldenheim v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2009cv11840
Plaintiff:
Paul D. Goldenheim
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and Daniel R. Levinson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Sebelius, et al
as 09-2392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESSEX SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., MAXIMUS FEDERAL SERVICES, INC., KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and others
Ahmed v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2009cv11441
Plaintiff:
Abdul Razzaque Ahmed, M.D.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2009cv11156
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wattleton v. Sebellus
as 09-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Muckle et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv10678
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Muckle
Defendant:
United States of America, George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
