Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Louis Branch v. D. Umphenour, et al
as 22-15047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS BRANCH
Defendant / Appellee:
D. UMPHENOUR, Building 250 Officer, Avenal Prison, L. SZALAI, C/O and J. ALVAREZ, C/O
Defendant:
N. GRANNIS, Chief, Inmate Appeals Branch, Sacramento, KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS and A. MANCINAS, Classification and Parole Representative, Avenal Prison
Louis Branch v. D. Umphenour, et al
as 20-15185
Defendant:
A. MANCINAS, Classification and Parole Representative, Avenal Prison, N. GRANNIS, Chief, Inmate Appeals Branch, Sacramento and KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. UMPHENOUR, Building 250 Officer, Avenal Prison, L. SZALAI, C/O and J. ALVAREZ, C/O
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS BRANCH
Armentero v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv01423
Plaintiff:
Luis L. Armentero
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andy Delgado Rodriguez v. Kathy Mendoza-Power
as 14-15287
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDY DELGADO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS
Rodriguez v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2013cv01513
Petitioner:
Andy Delgado Rodriguez
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ralph Hawthorne, Jr. v. Kathy Mendoza-Power, et al
as 13-15176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH HAWTHORNE, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHY MENDOZA-POWER and K. HENRY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2004cv03339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-16404
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diaz v. Cates et al
as 1:2011cv00744
Plaintiff:
Richard Diaz
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, Kathy Mendoza-Powers, James Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben Sanchez v. Kathy Power
as 10-56694
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUBEN SANCHEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHY MENDOZA POWERS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
