Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Benitez v. Mendoza-Powers et al
as 1:2008cv00656
Petitioner: Victor Benitez
Respondent: Kathy Mendoza-Powers and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dubinka v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2008cv00660
Petitioner: Michael Dubinka
Respondent: Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Evans v. Mendoza-Powers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00629
Petitioner: Flenord Evans
Respondent: Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flenord Evans v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers
as 2:2008cv02675
Petitioner: Flenord Evans
Respondent: Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Dubinka v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers
as 2:2008cv02608
Petitioner: Michael Dubinka
Respondent: Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Mendoza-Powers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00364
Petitioner: Jan R. Hill
Respondent: Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2008cv00322
Petitioner: Edward Lee Thomas
Respondent: Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arthur Marcelo v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers
as 2:2008cv01328
Petitioner: Arthur Marcelo
Respondent: Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Coleman v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00480
Petitioner: James Coleman
Respondent: Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilliam v. State of CA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01987
Defendant: State of California, John Pappenfus, Susan Flores and others
Plaintiff: David Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?