Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Gilliam v. State of California et al
as 2:2007at00870
Defendant:
State of California, John Pappenfus, Susan Flores and others
Plaintiff:
David Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Dawson et al
as 1:2007cv01325
Plaintiff:
Lon Carter
Defendant:
Nick Dawson, MD Bear, Pam Karr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Powers
as 1:2007cv01317
Petitioner:
Benjamin Melendrez Wilson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avery v. Director of CDCR, et al.
as 1:2007cv01175
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lewis Avery, Sr.
Defendant:
Director of CDCR, G Gonzales, J. Amaya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chhoun v. Power et al
as 3:2007cv01407
Petitioner:
Chhouy Chhoun
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza Power, James Tilton and Jerry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawthorne v. Mendoza-Power et al
as 1:2007cv01101
Plaintiff:
Ralph Kelly Hawthorne, Jr.
Defendant:
Kathy Mendoza-Power, S. K. Pennywell, J DonDiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Law v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00978
Petitioner:
Perry Jessie Law
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farlough v. Garcia et al
as 1:2007cv00970
Plaintiff:
Dexter S.C. Farlough
Defendant:
Garcia, Blackford, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00911
Petitioner:
Damien Coleman
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dexter S C Farlough v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers
as 2:2007cv03981
Petitioner:
Dexter S C Farlough
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
