Cases 1 - 10 of 19
(SS) Kontokanis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv01337
Plaintiff:
Katina Kontokanis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ian Laderace Folmer, II v. Los Angeles County Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2021cv09842
Plaintiff:
Ian Laderace Folmer, II
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Public Defenders Office, Clara Shortridge Folz Criminal Justice Center, Los Angeles County Superior Court Hollywood Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. County of Napa
as 3:2021cv04603
Plaintiff:
Katina Davis and Jae Steward
Defendant:
County of Napa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis et al v. County of Napa
as 2:2021at00540
Plaintiff:
Katina Davis and Jae Steward
Defendant:
County of Napa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Leaser et al v. Prime Ascot, L.P. et al
as 2:2020cv02502
Defendant:
Prime/South Coast, L.P., Prime Mesa, L.P., Prime Wellington Park, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nicha Leaser, Katina Magee, Joyce Eisman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00427
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
CABRERA et al v. EQUIFAX INC.
as 8:2018cv00954
Plaintiff:
STEVEN THOMAS LAWSON, CRAIG DIVINE, GERALD ARTHUR CARTER and others
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tamara Lynch Acheronti et al v. Equifax Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00955
Plaintiff:
Tamara Lynch Acheronti, Maria Cabrera, Adam James Carlson and others
Defendant:
Does and Equifax Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
