Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Guss v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00703
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Katina L. Guss
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Lucas v. Pfarner et al
as 2:2019cv00503
Defendant:
Performance Food Group, County of Craven, North Carolina & District 3B, City of Morris, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Despina N.A. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Crowder v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Katina Crowder
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Eastern Regional Medical Center, Inc. et al v. Haynesworth
as 4:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Eastern Regional Medical Center, Inc. and Cancer Treatment Centers of America Professional Corporation of Pennsylvania, P.C.
Defendant:
Katina Haynesworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bey et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Akil R. Bey and Katina Bowers-Graves
Defendant:
Sharon Gregory Jacobs, Marilynn C. Goss, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowers-Graves v. RRHA et al
as 3:2014cv00458
Plaintiff:
Katina Bowers-Graves
Defendant:
RRHA and Kena Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Burton v. Petersburg Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Barbara Burton
Defendant:
Petersburg Department of Social Services , Joan M. O'Donnell, Katina C. Whitfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Botten v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Katina Botten
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lightfoot v. Astrue
as 6:2007cv00007
Plaintiff:
Katina A. Lightfoot
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
