Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Miles v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Nancy Stacken, Courtney Menton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stamps v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv03014
Plaintiff:
Alessandra Katie Stamps
Defendant:
United States of America, Colette Peters, Andre Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv01823
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stamps v. Segal
as 0:2023cv01076
Petitioner:
Alessandra Katie Stamps
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stamps v. Segal
as 0:2022cv02279
Petitioner:
Alessandra Katie Stamps
Respondent:
Warden Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Prouty v. Johnson et al
as 0:2021cv02438
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
Nancy Johnson, Jodi Harpstead, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02227
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jessica Joyal, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. DHS-MSOP employees et al.
as 0:2021cv02207
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, Nicole Kielty, Jessica Joyal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02179
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jeremy Wouri, Sue Swansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02044
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
DHS-MSOP employees, David Miles, Steve Sajdek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
