Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rinaldi et al v. Dockter et al
as 1:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Kauffman, Bruce Conahan, Sharon Ann Rinaldi and others
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Enoch Elijah Dockter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Merkle v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2017cv00778
Plaintiff:
Adam Merkle
Defendant:
S Kauffman and Anne Arundel County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ham v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 1:2013cv03501
Plaintiff:
Doyle R. Ham, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Dayena Corcoren, John Wolfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Davis v. Home Loan Services-First Franklin Loan Services et al
as 8:2013cv01780
Plaintiff:
Nicole Monique Davis
Defendant:
Home Loan Services-First Franklin Loan Services, Lasalle Bank National Association-Trustee for First Franklin Mortgage loan Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset Backed Certificates, Banking Branch and Trust Company, Bank of America Home Loans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Cleveland et al v. Sofronski et al
as 1:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
James Cleveland , Hilda Mitchell and Matthew Kauffman
Defendant:
Michael D. Sofronski, M.D. , Delmarva Bariatric Center, P.A. and Peninsula Regional Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kauffman v. Richfood, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02589
Plaintiff:
Gary Kauffman
Defendant:
Richfood, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Keyes v. Kauffman et al
as 1:2007cv01149
Plaintiff:
Darnell Alonzo Keyes
Defendant:
Rena Kauffman and Inc. Pearle Vision Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00852
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
