Cases 1 - 10 of 36
DAVIS v. KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK et al
as 1:2024cv04755
Plaintiff:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, INDIANS DEES STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHEN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHEN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, EXECUTOR OF THE COUNTY OF NEWWARK, ESSEX COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv07487
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE
Defendant:
SAMANTHA LNU, KEEFE CORPORATION, RICHARD T. SMITH and others
Interested Party:
TARA D. SIMMONS-ARCHIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORTON v. KELSEY et al
as 1:2020cv01562
Plaintiff:
KEAON HORTON
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID KELSEY and KEEFE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. BROYLES et al
as 3:2019cv18950
Defendant:
ROBERT C FISCHER, J MICHAEL BROYLES, JAMES COTUGNO and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
KEEFE v. SETTEMBRINO et al
as 3:2019cv00121
Defendant:
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP N.J., MAYOR KEVIN M. SETTEMBRINO, MIDDLETOWN POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. KEEFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEFE v. CORZINE et al
as 3:2019cv00162
Defendant:
RONALD D. KEEFE, JON CORZINE, ALL MEMBERS OF PRESENT SENATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
KEEFE v. KEEFE et al
as 3:2018cv14512
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY, REGINA SAUTER, JAY SILVESTER and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD KEEFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEFE v. NJ DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2018cv07597
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. KEEFE
Defendant:
NJ DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, STATE OF NJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
