Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Smith, Jr. v. State of Alaska, Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Keen L.A. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Courts, Alaska State Trooper Agency and Timothy Cronin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Keen v. Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keen
Defendant:
Cross and S. Wailace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
M. Gonzalez, Garrett, Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv05337
Plaintiff:
Eshawn Maurice Harrell
Defendant:
Ryan Martin, San Mateo County Probation Department, Ema Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Gann v. Valley State Prison, et al
as 22-16862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN
Defendant / Appellee:
VALLEY STATE PRISON, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATEWIDE RELIGIOUS REVIEW COMMITTEE, J. KNIGHT, Appeals Examiner at the Office of Appeals (CDCR) and others
Walker v. Keen et al
as 3:2021cv08799
Plaintiff:
Le'Ondre Walker
Defendant:
Jhon Keen, District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley, David Haubert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Picart v. Pollard et al
as 3:2021cv01849
Plaintiff:
Louis Picart
Defendant:
Pollard, Lt. Luna, Sgt. Keene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2021cv00137
Petitioner:
Keen L.A. Smith, JR.
Respondent:
Department of Public Safety, Department of Corrections, Department of Law and others
Smith v. Palmer Courthouse et al
as 3:2021cv00131
Petitioner:
Keen L.A. Smith, JR.
Respondent:
Palmer Courthouse and Goose Creek Corr. Cntr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCullom v. Keen
as 5:2021cv01172
Defendant:
Unknown and Jhon Keen
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. McCullom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
