Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Lockridge v. Sedita et al
as 1:2011cv00249
Plaintiff:
Vern Ramon Lockridge
Defendant:
Frank Sedita, III and Keene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keene v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00360
Plaintiff:
Helena Keene
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Keene v. Chavis et al
as 1:2009cv08356
Plaintiff:
Eli Keene
Defendant:
Lorena Chavis, John Does 1-10, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Siani v. State University of New York at Farmingdale et al
as 2:2009cv00407
Plaintiff:
Dominick J. Siani
Defendant:
State University of New York at Farmingdale, W. Hubert Keen, Beverly L. Kahn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv02449
Plaintiff:
Teddy Moore
Defendant:
City of New York, Richard A. Brown, James A. Liander and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stuart v. American Insulation et al
as 1:2008cv03923
Plaintiff:
Cal Stuart
Defendant:
American Insulation, Anchor Packing Company, Combustion Engineering and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson, et al v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 1:2007cv04506
Plaintiff:
Derrick Anderson, Melisa Arnquist, Steven Batson and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tse et al v. Golden Bridge Restaurant, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2007cv08098
Plaintiff:
Brandy Tse, Bao R. Yu, Guo Q. Yan and others
Defendant:
Golden Bridge Restaurant, L.L.C., Philip Wu, Michael Gee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Coalition, L.L.C., et al v. Autozone, Inc., et al
as 0:2000cv00953
Plaintiff:
Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., Robert Elgart & Son, Inc., Amelia's Automotive, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Advance Stores Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
