Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Keen v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jenny A. Keen
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Sealey v. Prine et al
as 7:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Sealey
Defendant:
Chris Prine, Michelle Keene and William Woolridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Patterson et al
as 5:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Walters
Defendant:
Samuel L Patterson, Samuel L Patterson, Keen Transport Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gibbons v. Keene
as 5:2009cv00321
Petitioner:
Walter Gibbons
Respondent:
Captain Keene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollomon v. Lewis et al
as 7:2009cv00109
Plaintiff:
William Earl Hollomon
Defendant:
Shirley Lewis, Louis White, Southern Health Partners Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Warnock et al
as 7:2009cv00105
Plaintiff:
Travis A Woods
Defendant:
Officer Warnock, Josh Adcock, Michelle Keene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Keene et al
as 7:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Walter Everett Moore, III
Defendant:
Michelle Keene, Sgt. James, Sheriff Prine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Keene et al
as 7:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
Charvezz Davis
Defendant:
Captain Keene, Lt. Elkins and Sgt. Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes et al v. Lowndes County Ga. et al
as 7:2009cv00088
Plaintiff:
Porterfield Stokes and Dwight Mathis
Defendant:
Lowndes County Ga., Lowndes County Jail, Chris Prine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCumbers v. Bennett et al
as 2:2009cv00073
Petitioner:
Jerry Allen McCumbers
Respondent:
Wayne V. Bennett, Sonny Perdue and Jerry Keen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
