Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ARMISTEAD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04871
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALEXANDER ARMISTEAD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08447
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 4:2020cv01542
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Jefferson Dunn, Roderick Gadson and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77390
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALEXANDER TINSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66722
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv21368
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KEITH ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander v. Hawkings et al
as 2:2018cv00978
Defendant:
Michael T. Wheat, Lt. Caldroun and Wayne G. Hawkings
Plaintiff:
Keith Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00144
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Alexander
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
H. Alexander v. Commr. of Social Security
as 10-14957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
H. KEITH ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Alexander v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv01518
Plaintiff:
H. Keith Alexander
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Type:
Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
