Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02062
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Al-Bareh v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00589
Petitioner:
Loui H Al-Bareh
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Keith Nygren and Daniel Sedlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rose et al v. Nygren et al
as 3:2007cv50200
Plaintiff:
Xavier S Rose, Xavier S Rose, Xavier S Rose and others
Defendant:
Keith Nygren and Patrick B. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dooley-Trewartha v. McHenry County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2007cv05197
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dooley-Trewartha and Kelly Dooley-Trewartha
Defendant:
McHenry County Sheriff's Office, Keith Nygren, Zane Seipler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanard et al v. Nygren et al
as 3:2007cv50132
Plaintiff:
H. Michael Stanard, Joeleen Stanard and One Zero Charlie Productions Inc
Defendant:
Keith Nygren, Ron Page, Hector Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Alshatarat v. Nygren et al
as 1:2007cv03296
Petitioner:
Rawhi Alshatarat and Rawhi Alshatarat
Respondent:
Keith Nygren and Tom Svoboda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Nygren et al
as 3:2007cv50038
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Defendant:
Keith Nygren, Keith Nygren, E Kazort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silva v. Nygren et al
as 1:2006cv06222
Plaintiff:
Brian Silva
Defendant:
Keith Nygren, Keith Nygren, Deputy Chief Sedlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banda et al v. Nygren et al
as 3:2007cv50013
Plaintiff:
Elliot Emmanuel Banda, Anthony Taylor, Braden Baker and others
Defendant:
Keith Nygren, Scott Mueller and Ken Koehler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
