Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Tarun Vyas v. Chad Morris
as 23-6625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TARUN KUMAR VYAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD MORRIS, Special Agent, V.S.P., ALYCIA ELDRIDGE, Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney, HEAD OF THE INTERNAL CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN (I.C.A.C) DIVISION OF VSP and others
Kenneth Kelley v. William Bohrer
as 23-6179
Petitioner:
KENNETH KELLEY
Respondent:
WILLIAM S. BOHRER, Acting Warden and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
James Brown v. D. Leu
as 23-6120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES W. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. LEU, Warden, D. SMITH, Captain, R. CARMONA, Unit Manager and others
US v. Reggie Kelley
as 22-7367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
REGGIE LAMAR KELLEY, a/k/a Lil Red
Antonio Kelley v. Motsumi Moja
as 16-7635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO LORENZO KELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MOTSUMI MOJA, Medical Doctor, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, (CCS), CORIZON, Medical and others
Douglas Thompson v. Captain Kelley
as 14-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN KELLEY and LT HARRIET
Defendant:
TURBEVILLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SCDC and INMATE JAMES PILGRIM
US v. Reggie Kelley
as 13-7632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REGGIE LAMAR KELLEY, a/k/a Lil Red
Marvin J. Moody v. Todd B. Perseghin
as 13-7089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985
Defendant:
CAITLIN R. KELLEY, Assistant Commonwealth Atty and CLARENCE N. JENKINS
US v. Reggie Kelley
as 13-6189
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REGGIE LAMAR KELLEY, a/k/a Lil Red
Darren Simmons v. Shelley Stoke
as 12-7322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREN SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROLAND MCFADDEN, Warden, ROBIN CHAVIS, AMY SMITH, RN Nurse and others
Defendant:
HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS, ROBERT SCHULZE, JR., MD, JENNIFER A. FELDMAN, MD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
