Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Johnson v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2009cv00210
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Emily Kennedy, Joella Puentes, Judy Faris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agim v. Adams et al
as 2:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
Chima Agim
Defendant:
John H Adams, Jamie L Baker, Paul W Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houser v. Whitmore et al
as 1:2009cv00527
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wayne Houser
Defendant:
Annie M Whitmore, Gary A Patten, Eastwood L Almazan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Gaydos v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 09-40479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK L GAYDOS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, REYNALDO CASTRO, KELVIN SCOTT and others
Caraway v. The Lone Star State of Texas et al
as 1:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Randal Franklin Caraway
Defendant:
The Lone Star State of Texas, TDCJ-CID, Brad Livingston and others
Movant:
Russell Jay Reger
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. English, et al
as 09-40157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MCCLAIRY JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FREDDIE M ENGLISH, Property Officer, NATRENIA HICKS, JOE N ROSS, Property Officer and others
Flores v. Cook et al
as 1:2009cv00009
Petitioner:
Christopher Flores
Respondent:
Cary J Cook, Kevin P Pinney, Richard D Avants and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McGary v. Morales, et al
as 08-51291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRARD MCGARY
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL MORALES, Senior Warden, KENNETH R BRIGHT, JR., CAROL E MONROE, JR. and others
Caraway v. The Lone Star State of Texas et al
as 1:2008cv00876
Plaintiff:
Randal Franklin Caraway
Defendant:
The Lone Star State of Texas, TDCJ-CID, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lucky v. Ward, et al
as 08-41091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY LUCKY
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLI WARD, RICHARD A TRINCI, JR., CHUMA ANADUAKA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
