Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Boone v. Kijakazi
as 23-40401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bradley Thomas Boone and Ann Doe
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, Kelly Matthews, Administrative Law Judge and Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Brehm v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv02345
Plaintiff:
Kelly Brehm
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Webster v. Giddings et al
as 6:2022cv00882
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Webster, Jr.
Defendant:
Karen Giddings, Czarnowski Display Service, Inc., Trumbull Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Webster v. Kijakazi et al
as 6:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Webster, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Whitney Thorp, Czarnowski Display Service, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Boone v. Saul et al
as 3:2021cv00279
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Boone
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kelly Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lea v Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00988
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lynne Lea
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brooks v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Kelly Latrice Brooks
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pittman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02579
Plaintiff:
Kellie Michelle Pittman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kelly v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
Read Baggett Kelly
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Mifflin-Kee v. Commissioner Social Security
as 5:2019cv00576
Plaintiff:
Kelly Jo Mifflin-Kee
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
