Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Healthcare Association of Hawaii
as 1:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelly
Defendant:
Healthcare Association of Hawaii and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Meyer et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Randall Kelly Meyer and Sams Antics Incorporated
Defendant:
President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., State of Nebraska, Mike Hilgers and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Xian et al v. Jasmer et al
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Xian, Julie C. Valadez, Susan Lim Liang and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-50, Molly Jasmer, Detective Trevor G. Hinman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Locricchio v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00445
Defendant:
Attorney General William Barr, Senator Martha McSally, Sec. of Treasury Munichen and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Locricchio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scutt v. Dorris et al
as 1:2020cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jason Scutt
Defendant:
Xiayin (Gaoquiang) Lin, Kelli Dorris and Charlene Chen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00498
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
