Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Pagidas, M.D. v. Buster, M.D.
as 1:2016cv00390
Defendant:
John E. Buster, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Kelly Pagidas, M.D.
Intervenor:
Previvo Genetics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
M. K. a minor et al v. Town of Tiverton et al
as 1:2014cv00346
Defendant:
Town of Tiverton , Tiverton School Department , Mary Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
M. K. and Michele Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paletta et al v. Rhode Island Board of Examiners in Dentistry et al
as 1:2014cv00309
Defendant:
Rhode Island Board of Examiners in Dentistry , Rhode Island Board of Pharmacy , Catherine Cordy and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Paletta , Mohammad Banki and Facial & Oral Surgery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kelly v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kelly
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Greenwood v. Preventure, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00622
Plaintiff:
Kelly Greenwood
Defendant:
Preventure, Inc., Mark Correia, Kathy O'Neel-Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mattiucci v. Metlife Global Compensation and Benefits et al
as 1:2012cv00938
Plaintiff:
Robert Mattiucci
Defendant:
Metlife Global Compensation and Benefits and Jan M. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
