Cases 1 - 10 of 243
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Splant v. Cisco
as 2:2024cv02025
Defendant:
Christopher Cisco and Ford County Circuit Clerk
Plaintiff:
Kelly Splant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Johnston v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Fernando Washington, Tia Washington, Wanda Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelsrud v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2023cv01460
Petitioner:
Kelly Jo Nelsrud
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sutton v. Kleen
as 1:2023cv01444
Plaintiff:
Mattie Sutton
Defendant:
Kellie Kleen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01411
Plaintiff:
Kelly A Lee
Defendant:
Matt Smith, Woodford County Illinois, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Krumey v. Duffy et al
as 4:2023cv04158
Plaintiff:
Jospeh Edward Krumey, III
Defendant:
Travis Duffy, Kelly Twaddle, Anthony Wasielewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv03270
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
Transunion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
